What was actually built?
This build implements the boundary between a three-field audit form and an external orchestration workflow. The browser submits an enquiry, the server validates it, and only an explicit downstream acknowledgement produces success. The integration is intentionally unavailable until configured. This is a code-level teardown, not a production client case study.
What did the workflow look like before?
The prior workspace contained a generic single-page agency site whose main conversion was a contact anchor. There was no structured audit intake route in the inspected application. That observation concerns the local site implementation; it is not a measured claim about the founder’s previous sales process.
What decisions does the new boundary make?
The server accepts a bounded email, an allowed business type, and a workflow description of practical length. It rejects malformed input, cross-origin submissions, and oversized bodies. It keeps the Make destination and authorization secret on the server. A honeypot rejects basic automated submissions without collecting an extra visible field.
How is failure handled?
An absent integration returns an honest unavailable message. A timeout does not imply the request was lost or received; the visitor sees that receipt could not be confirmed. The browser retains the input. A retry uses the same request key, and the connected orchestrator must deduplicate that key before creating a second lead.
Why does the audit still need approval?
An audit can contain estimates, recommendations, or implied commercial expectations. AUDITOR therefore drafts under AMBER. The downstream queue retains the report, its assumptions, and a content hash. Founder approval authorizes only that exact version. No client email is sent by the local preview.
What is the actual result?
The deliverable is a working validation and acknowledgement boundary with explicit connection requirements. There are no measured customer conversion rates, time savings, or live response-time results. The verification report in the build documentation records software checks separately from production evidence. Live outcome measurement starts only after connected runs exist.
What would the next controlled test prove?
Connect a test intake scenario, submit a duplicate request key, interrupt the acknowledgement, and retry. Confirm one ClickUp job, one review task, and no unapproved email. Then test a rejected audit and a changed report after approval. Neither should be released under a stale decision.
Written for KLYRFOCUS · Updated 2026-09-06 · Estimates are labeled; measured results require source records.